The Past and the Future

University Archives

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Sat, 20 Dec 2008 16:19:00 +0000

Early in December, I had a meeting with the pro tem Archivist of my alma mater and a member of the Alumni Association staff. Since I'm friends with the archivist, it was more to gauge how the staffer would react. I don't know that I was hoping for more but I certainly wasn't surprised by the lack of ability to help--mostly because she was told upfront by HER boss "don't give it too much attention."

However, I had two cards in my pocket--but I could pull only one--and I had to hope that the one I pulled was the ace. I played the card on Tuesday by having lunch with the university's outgoing Chairman of Trustees. He was very receptive and promised to speak with the President and current Chairman during the Executive Committee meeting which took place Thursday. Yesterday I received an email stating that both were enthusiastic and "willing to help". The President assigned one of the VPs (actually the boss of the Alumni Association Director!) to work with me on the project. The card turned out to be an Ace.

I am not a fan of going over anyone's head simply because I don't like the answer. I am, however, also not a fan of saying "no" simply because you think it will cause you more work. If there are legitimate reasons, and sound thinking behind the 'no', it's ok. So, while I broke on of my own personal 'rules' and went over the heads of everyone, it's honestly for the right reasons and will be for the benefit of the school, students, faculty and alumni, in the end.

More to come as events unfold.

~Cheers

Lost and Found

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 18:00:00 +0000

I'm a firm believer in teaching the new generations of historians to do hard core, in your face, hands-on research in archives, libraries, etc. I am agog at the growing information available on the web these days. The two came together for me. Let me back up a bit.

My grandmother died in March. She had a falling out with her mother DECADES ago and in the end, never knew when/where/how her mother died. Neither did anyone in the family, including her only living grandson. So in an attempt to help my uncle, I began the search to find out.

Some answers came when I was going through my grandmother's papers. I found old letters from a name I didn't recognize. The chances were good that great-gran had remarried--while a good hunch, the letters were from 1964. She could have remarried dozens of times in the decades. However, thanks ancestry.com's free trial, I was able to get great-gran's DOB and other needed info to begin the search.

Then, next to the wonderful online database Social Security Death Index. I've used this for work so many times. I started plugging in the information I had on hand. After about thirty minutes, I FOUND HER! I had her date of death. I couldn't believe it. She lived until 1989--amazing that she lived so long after the letters were dated and no one in the family knew it.

Next--confirm it with an obituary. For those who've done searches in newspapers, you know that this is spotty at best with papers that aren't the national ones (Wash Post, NY Times, etc). BUT! I lucked out, the local paper had joined an online database and you could search for free (for those obits from 1987 to present). What luck! I began searching. No luck, until I decided to change the spelling of the last name and bingo! There she was. It confirmed the date of birth I had, the date of death and her 'childhood' home state!

I had to find out where her remains were, however, the funeral home AND hospital were no longer in existence. This was going to be a little harder. This is where the personal skills come in handy. I called the city's Public Records office and spoke with a very nice woman who sympathized and offered the names of a couple cemeteries that were near the former hospital location.

From that point forward, it was a matter of calling the cemeteries. As I struck out left and right, I was starting to worry that her remains were not buried and that she was scattered. But, today, I found her. Holy cow, I found her. After 45 years, my great-gran is known to the family once again.

~Cheers, Netter

We're famous--sorta

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 00:08:00 +0000

So the Pentagon Channel decided to do a story on the History Division, but alas, when the story aired, it wasn't right. However, it got the idea down.

Check it out at www.pentagonchannel.mil under "Around the Services" for 24 November--and yes, I'm the one fiddlin' with the microfilm! It's the first story in the program :) Enjoy, Cheers Netter

Plotting a Coup

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Fri, 10 Oct 2008 10:54:00 +0000

Sorry for the disappearing trick--work, class, life, blah blah....

As a newly dubbed member of my alma mater's alumni association board of directors (wow that's a mouthful), I am gearing up for my first board meeting later this month. Long before becoming a "director", plotting began. My mentor and I have been seriously concerned with the state of the university and particularly the History Department AND the University Archives.

In the past decade the school has focused on growth outside it's traditional roots--into the health sciences and all the buildings that go with that. The Arts and Sciences (and particularly the History Dept) have largely been left to their own devices. Yes, there is a new building, but that's really a cosmetic band-aid covering a weakend department. One of the long-time professors retired. Some say he cut and run (and rightfully so). He had fostered an Institute that was perfect for the school and it's location in a city wrought with Civil War history. That Institute has languished since his departure. His replacement? Not real sure what her strength is.

The University Archives, if you can call them that, should be a source of pride and cultivation. It should be the center for the school's records retention policy but also the lifeblood of the school's past. However, it occupies a room the size of a small classroom, has no funding, no dedicated fulltime staff and the school has no records retention policy--well, that we can find. Again, a school so enveloped in Civil War history, it should be flourishing.

Thus, I have taken it upon my shoulders to drawing attention to, via my board membership, a few things:

1. With the economic crisis, what are the school's plans for "holding the line" but yet attracting and enrolling students who are willing to pay the private school tuition?

2. If the school honestly does not have a records retention policy, then a committee should be formed from alumni, trustees, faculty, and outside archival professionals to create one.

3. What are the goals for the Arts and Sciences department?

There are more but you get the gist of it all. This is a time for the school to tighten the belt, pull up the bootstraps and hunker down for the long haul. They need to focus on the heart of the school--liberal arts education--and pour energies into rebuilding a stable, sound and attractive history program that teaches the kids about sound research and writing skills and provides practical experience (ie see university archives).

The years coming up are going to see a hiring freeze and yet large numbers of baby boomers retiring from a variety of academic and federal history program jobs. BUT, opportunities are going to still exist and giving these students of history a leg up is going to be the edge the school can exploit--if it so chooses.

Off to the family homestead where the leaves are just beautiful this year....
~Cheers

Not in right now...

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:54:00 +0000

You've reached Netter's blog. Netter is unavailable at this time due to relocating her home. She will return after the move is complete. Thank you for stopping by, please leave a message after the beep.

BEEEP

Singing the Praises

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:40:00 +0000

As a historian who spends a great deal of time conducting research and not alot of writing, I'm often confused with librarians. In the past, I have taken great offense to this. "I'm a professionally trained historian! I do more than simply look things up!" However, in the course of this latest research project and the Texas one, I have come to respect librarians much more.

It was a librarian who found copies of the Senate hearings and had them inter-library loaned to me. It was this librarian who found several sources for me that I was unable to find on my own. All hail the talents of the librarian!

Speaking of the Senate hearings--oh what a treasure trove of information this is. In some places its nearly a verbatim repeat of the court martial so while I wait for those records, I'm at least getting a glimpse into those proceedings as well! Only one problem--it's on microfiche--and at last check, I don't have a microfiche reader at home where I like to do my reading and note taking on this case. However, one new innovation in microfilm and fiche technology is the reader than can be connected to a computer and create digital copies of the film or fiche! We have this at work, albeit not yet hooked up, but it will be on Monday! I can't wait!

Happy weekend to all,
~Cheers

Lastest Research Project III

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:37:00 +0000

Finally, another nut cracked. I think I found the son of the Lieutenant! I wrote a letter asking him if he is the son of the Lt and if so, if he'd be willing to meet with me to discuss his father. I know it's a long shot but I'm hoping that maybe it will yield some good information.

I am still waiting to hear from several repositories for records or any additional materials. I hope to hear something soon. The more I read, the more I think that the Lt was railroaded and drummed out of the service wrongly.

More to come as it appears.

Latest Research Project II

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Sat, 05 Jul 2008 19:13:00 +0000

The Marine in question was seemingly a well respected aviator, he was sent to France ahead of all Marine aviation units to scout out locations for the squadrons. Somewhere along the way, he ended up in a British aircraft, shot down 5 enemy planes, crash landed behind enemy lines, captured a German soldier, saved a French colonial soldier and made it back to friendly lines---all unscathed.

This is the bone of contention. The story was picked up by Frazier Hunt of the Chicago Tribune and made headlines back in the states. There was an unwritten regulation that stated no publicity was to be had. The Lieutenant was put in for commendations and as the fervor was building the British began an informal investigation as to the exact exploits. Before too long, the Lieutenant found himself charged with falsehood. Court-martialed for spreading lies and garnering publicity falsely.

The trial gained more headlines in the press than the exploits. Several 'giants-to-be' of the Corps were called to testify, and if the local press was to be believed, the Lieutenant was going to be found not guilty. However, that was not to be. The young Lieutenant was tried, convicted and dismissed from the Marine Corps in 1919.

All this was gained from the biographical file on the Lieutenant. However, there had to be more information. A random two line entry buried in a 1921 newspaper stated that the Lieutenant (by then a private citizen) had testified before a Senate subcommittee regarding his court martial. Further research yielded that the Lieutenant's hearings lasted into 1925!!

The materials of the History Division exhausted, the next steps were mandatory if the truth was to be discovered. What did his service record indicate? Does his court martial records still exist with the Navy JAG? What about the Senate Subcommittee hearings? The Commandant of the Marine Corps and Secretary of Navy were both involved at various stages--what do their records indicate?

Soon --- as records are consulted and copies are received, the truth will be revealed.

~Cheers!

Latest Research Project I

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 02:09:00 +0000

While I am a historian, I am not employed as a writer. I conduct detailed research, but 99% of the time, am not involved in the writing or the final product other than an as an acknowledgment in a published book or article.

I don't think writers are superior to the type of historian I am; however, they are more often the ones who get noticed. I also have had my own qualms about my writing. I have never thought very highly of it but in the past 5-6 years, I have seen it improve and many have commented that it has improved drastically. I published my first full-length article a couple months ago and received several compliments--two of which were from very respected men. I was honored and humbled.

I found it very easy to write about the brigade in Texas. I was anxious to tell people, through words and images, about these men who served there time outside of France. I think that is what made the difference in my writing—finding that aspect of history that had not been written about a million times, but something that I could dig into (using those research skills) and then write about.

Recently, while using the Proquest database, I found a short article from 1918 heralding the exploits of a Marine aviator. The article stated that the aviator had been recommended for the Victoria Cross AND the Medal of Honor. I wanted to know a little bit more about this aviator so I checked our website to see what is biography stated—all MOH receipients are on our website. His name wasn’t there.

Why his name wasn't there and what happened to the aviator is just the beginning. More to come....

~Cheers

Catching up

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:55:00 +0000

A little over two weeks after my last post, my Grandmother died. We were very close. Since March, I have been running her estate, working tons, finishing up the semester, traveling for work and playing nurse for my younger sister who was hospitalized twice. It's been a crazy journey.

On the professional side of things it's been busy as well. My article "Over Here: Marines in Texas during WWI" was published in Fortitudine and I am currently awaiting word on a proposed article about the Marine Corps History Division. I am hot on the trail of a very interesting story from the annals of Marine Corps history after running across a snippit on APS from 1918. More on that later.

I'm knee deep in two works on military history. I was able to hear Dr Jeremy Black speak while I attending the Society for Military History conference in April. His work Rethinking Military History is very good and I've marked the pages up with plenty of notes and questions. I am also reading Dr Williamson Murray's work The Past as Prologue--another interesting piece that gives me more background and understanding of the profession I have chosen.

Interns are back for the summer. I was able to chose my intern--an undergrad from Mary Washington who was doing pro bono work for MSG HQ on base. I lured him away with money--he wasn't getting paid at MSG. He is turning out to be a great help and very interested in the unique work we do in the office. If he was graduating next year I would tell him to be ready as many retirements are going to start and we are going to be looking for someone to join, in a junior capacity.

As I do not want to run on, I will leave things as they are and post this. As my research project fleshes out I will post it on here. Enjoy!

~Cheers

Been a while

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:00:00 +0000

Yes, I know it's been a while. I've been swamped and the laptop went down so I'm on my sister's desktop which has NONE of my bookmarks etc.

I've written an article on the 3d Brigade in Texas for our magazine and I've decided NOT to do a thesis with the hopes of graduating by Dec '09--and that's with taking a course this summer. Oiy.

More to come, sorry for being absent so long.

~Cheers,
Netter

Military History Comes Home

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Sat, 05 Jan 2008 15:14:00 +0000

Some historians can forget that what they are writing about or reading about or researching is the story of real lives--real people. While I get a daily dose of reminder because of the nature of my job, I got a reality check just after Christmas.

My step brother is in Iraq right now. He was wounded when his humvee hit an IED.

All I have to say is that it's good for us to all remember the human side of what we study. Let us never forget these persons had families, friends and other loved ones.

Another Suggestion

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Mon, 24 Dec 2007 01:02:00 +0000

After running into a website for a post-graduate history lab in the UK, I thought, "why not do something like this with your fellow military history workers, researchers, etc from work and SHFG?"

The Military History Laboratory, sponsored by....
and that's where the questions began. Who would sponsor it? Why should they? Would anyone attend? Where do I start? Couple approaches came to mind.

Marine Corps History Laboratory: hosted by either Marine Corps University (yah, right), Marine Corps Heritage Foundation, or Marine Corps University Foundation. The latter two are more likely but doubtful. However, there is a pool here to pull from. The first invites could go out to the employees of HD, NMMC, GRC as well as students and post-baccalaureate faculty at MCU. Since the goal is to make this a peer-reviewed group, one would have to at least have a bachelor's in history or been published several times or working in the field to be invited.

Of course, there are more options when you expand to the broader community of military history.

Military History Laboratory: hosted by SHFG or SMH--more likely SHFG since it's local and the group would be local. Not only HD, NMMC, GRC and MCU people, but Army, Navy, Air Force, Coast Guard, National Guard, and Air National Guard Bureau personnel would be invited.

Goals? Well, one would be to foster relationships amongst the various organizations staff, but mostly to encourage those working on projects, who are writing, use the people as the first round of vetters, and simply to be able to exchange ideas in the comfort of comrades.

I wonder if this would fly? I may have to put out some feelers and see if anyone would be interested. I know it may conflict with the Military History Classics, but that may be too formal. Maybe I should start just with the Marine Corps and work the way up--who knows, may not get anyone to show.

Anyway, food for thought.

~Cheers

Pay Dirt, Again!

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Thu, 20 Dec 2007 22:32:00 +0000

Once again, I was just foolin' around with an idea and came across a stash of pictures--this time they were marked "Marine Corps, Fort Crockett"--holy cow! Simply amazing. Check out the bottom left hand corner of picture for written description.

Also, compare this to a modern day picture of Fort Crockett, some of the old buildings are still being used--not as they were intended but still being used!

Enjoy.

~Cheers

Pay dirt!

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Tue, 18 Dec 2007 02:23:00 +0000

I struck pay dirt today. On a scouting mission for materials for my tentative thesis topic, I found some pictures that were all labeled "unknown". They looked familiar, the people, the background, the pose--it hit me that they could be the "candid" shots of the regiment getting their "group" picture taken.

After doing some comparison (via the phone), I was skeptical because from the comparison some of the items didn't match up. It was later in the day that I saw the group shot and realized that I had found the pictures of the regiment but what I was comparing them to was the group shot of the BRIGADE!

I was floored--I had found a cache of pictures that NO one has, and they had gone "unknown" for 45 years and I had solved the puzzle. Oh wow, I was so excited. I still am. I am going to go back tomorrow and take digital shots of them and see if I can get them scanned for me.

Another gold mine today was the personal memoir (unpublished) of an enlisted man serving with the brigade--nearly a day by day blow of doings! AND I ran into the ONE person who knew about a "Giant" who served with the brigade and low-and-behold, the giant did an oral history! Oh man, I can't wait to dig into THAT tomorrow.

This is why I love my type of history--the research. These nuggets are gold to me. I love this, and I can't find the words to tell you why or how much. Just take my word for it :)

~Cheers!!!

Bits and Pieces

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 17:21:00 +0000

In the past month, I have been very busy--so I apologize to anyone who reads my ramblings. I'm not sure anyone does. Anywhoooo.

The SHFG holiday reception was earlier this month and it turned into a wonderful time, despite the cruddy weather. It also reinforced a feeling I've been having regarding those of the academic field of history. They don't much care for those of us who aren't 1/ PhDs and 2/Non university professors. I don't understand this and it makes me want to be snotty back to them--I'm bigger than that so I won't be.

I've had this feeling particularly since taking the latest class from a professor (who still shall remain nameless) who has made it very clear that I am an idiot, biased and can not be objective simply because of my employer. Um, jeez, lady, that sounds like you're saying that because I work for a particular company I don't have the freedom to come to my own conclusions--wow--she's wrong but what's worse is that she's in the same boat because she's not tenured yet.

This particular PhD will never find my name on her rolls again and I will quit the program if the make her my thesis adviser. After a class with her telling the entire room her 'theories' on topics where I'm considered the SME (subject matter expert) for my company (her ideas were wrong by the way), I knew I was in trouble. If I get a B in the class I will never say a bad word about her again.

Anyway, I digress. I don't know if I'm getting a bit 'full' of myself or if I'm actually starting to gain a bit of a good reputation at work, but it seems as though I'm being handed more and more high level responsibilities as compared to a couple of the others in the office. I just hope I live up to the expectations.

And, I'm sorry.... back to the issue of PhDs and their ideas regarding those of us non-academics, as someone once said, "Can't we all just get along?"

~Cheers

Dealing

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:27:00 +0000

How does one deal with difficult people? I don't normally have too much trouble short of the odd co-worker; however, I've been struggling all semester with my professor. I like to think that I can "win" someone over with my personality and demeanor but this professor has been a tough nut. My professor has disagreed with me on every statement that comes out of my mouth, this professor denounces my type of historical work as "tainted" and that I can not be objective and truthful when it comes to history because of my employer's influence.

There have been several occasions where upon my professor has spouted rumors and myths as fact. How can I safely object to these without jeopardizing my final grade? I've thought of zinging this person on their final evaluation, but that seems petty. So, I'm putting together a professional response with all factors and documentation that I will send to this person after the semester has ended.

I realize its the goal of instructors to challenge their students, but is it their right to question a students integrity, sincerity and honesty without provocation--solely based upon their employer?

Going gangbuster!

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Thu, 08 Nov 2007 01:16:00 +0000

I attended the Executive Council meeting yesterday and have been given the green light on the mentor project! I'm thrilled and humbled at the same time. I also took on the responsibility of coordinating the program--drafting a message to go out in the bulletin and an article to appear in the quarterly newsletter. I'm simply happy as a lark.

While attending the meeting, and after offering my services on another project, I've taken on additional responsibilities. Adopt-a-university is the project, and I adopted my alma mater and another university (which of course, will remain nameless). So I contacted my Alumni Association to make sure I wasn't stepping on any toes by going directly to the History Dept of my alma mater and after talking with the VP (whom I've known by email for many years), find myself invited to the opening of a new history related facility at the university. Again, humbled and honored.

Sometime ago, I had inquired about the board of directors of the alumni association and never heard back from the person in charge. However, after speaking with the VP today, I find that I may be a board member sooner than anticipated. At least, if nothing else, I made it known that I would like to donate time instead of money. In-kind gifts often yield more than cash donations--particularly when cash for the donor is hard to come by.

The moral of this whole story? I'm not sure there's a moral but at least I am doing my best to further the history field via my professional organization and alma mater--not to mention my own ambitions of taking over the world. One piece at a time :)

-Cheers

Ideas Galore!

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Sat, 03 Nov 2007 23:37:00 +0000

There are so many ideas floating around in my head. I'm so far down the 'food chain' that many of them are ignored. When they aren't ignored they are laughed at because no one wants to take on any additional duties. People who are only in it for the paycheck and not the passion really rub me the wrong way.

All that said is one reason why I pitched my mentor idea to the Society. They thought it was a cool idea and I've been invited to the Executive Council meeting on Tuesday to talk more about it. I'm very excited!

I wonder sometimes if I'm simply trying to control things or if I'm in over my head with all my ideas and my drive to do more--or am I just being a dumb kid?

Cheers,
Netter

Professionalism in the Workplace or Lack Thereof

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 22:36:00 +0000

I'm not real sure where I picked it up, could have been Grisamore's or just common sense, but I've always been pretty professional at dealing with the public. No matter the mood I'm in, I always deal with researchers (amateur or professional, General or PFC) with the same amount of respect, and personable-ness (I know it's not a real word). However, it seems that there are a growing number of persons in my immediate surroundings who lack the fundamentals of common courtesy and decency when dealing with others--let alone co-workers.

Today, during a meeting, one of the meeting persons decided it was time to give the rest of the meeting participants a lecture and with a seriously condescending tone and attitude. It was quite obvious to everyone in the room but all attempts to cut this offensive person off were met with continuous spewing. This is the same person who later starts on a rant -- I'm not sure she's done yet -- about a researcher. This researcher may have inadvertently misused materials, but instead of simply attending to the matter, this offending person went off on a tirade and never stopped. Everyone in the office was subjected to her verbal vomit. I started to get a headache and I know her voice had to be giving out--but she did not relent.

One of the few "netter-isms" is in relation to dealing with those in public, private, work, or anywhere--deal with them as if they were your grandmother. How would you want her handled? Would you want someone to verbally accost her in public when she asked an honest question? Would you want her to feel dumb as bricks simply for wondering? Of course not, and thus, treat everyone you deal with, with respect. Now, this of course doesn't go for those persons of the idiotic persuasion, who truly are stupid. Stupidity, of course, comes in many colors--like someone being a total ass in the office.

Regrettably, this person is totally oblivious to their failings. After the meeting, I was told, "I just had to say something. I didn't want them thinking that ... (irrelevant)." But alas, I am guilty of not saying in return, "Ya, well, you didn't need to make them feel like little kids and sound so degrading when you spoke." This is due to the fact that others have tried and failed. She simply can not acknowledge the fact that she has a problem.

How do you deal with someone so toxic? How do you deal with someone so toxic in the workplace and just doesn't get it? It's amazing she can't see it. It's sad.

~Cheers.

More on the Thesis...

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:43:00 +0000

I'm obsessed at the current moment with the thought of doing a thesis. Actually, I'm obsessed with possible topics--what's acceptable, what isn't? Can I pick my own topic? Do I have to do something that my advisor wants me to do? Most of this could easily (in theory) be answered by said advisor--but the advisor I have isn't exactly the most readily accessible let alone willing to answer my apparently tedious questions with understanding and concern.

Ok, better get back to my thesis issues before going off on a diatribe rant on my advisor. There are many many topics one could chose from. I have a topic in mind even. "The Evolution of the Marine Air-Ground Task Force and Case Study in Employment." Does sound dry when its all written out, doesn't it? Rest assured, it is worth a review--no official history has been written and as far as I can tell no other dissertation has been done on it.

There is another possible topic--it may not be long enough however. The Marines in World War I who did not deploy to France with the AEF. There were Marines stationed in Texas for various reasons from possible war with Mexico to the "Sugar Intervention" to German U-boats in the Gulf of Mexico.

Personally, that one doesn't trip my trigger. I'd like to stick to the post Civil War era through pre-World War I era. However, I'm not really sure what sounds like something that would thrill me. I don't know about you, but I have to be "into" my project to really write well. (Can't you tell with this blog?!)

I've asked a couple coworkers to go to lunch to help me mull this over and to get their opinions. As it stands right now, the thesis is going to happen. It shortens my graduate education by a year and that in turn helps me when time comes for 'fleeting up' the ranks at work---many vacancies to be had for the right people with the right mix of education and experience in the years to come. I don't want to have my knees cut out from under me simply because I haven't finished my MA yet.

Cheers!

Mentor Program Comments

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:18:00 +0000

Here are just a few of the comments from the various Executive Council members who've reviewed and discussed my proposal. I think they speak for themselves.

"I was pleased to see the very positive response to the mentor proposal at last week's Executive Council Meeting..."

"This does seem to be one of those ideas that makes you wonder why no one thought of it before"

"I agree that the original proposal for a mentor program is a logical and valuable extension of the Society's mission. It would enable us to enhance our presence and provide an important service and experience for all involved, including the history offices."

"I also think that the mentorship program is an excellent one and agree with Henry's modifications to Annette's terrific proposal."

There are lots of details to be worked out and responsibilities to be assigned, but for now, it looks as though its moving forward. I'm so happy that the suggestion was taken seriously and may see the light of day. Now on to my next suggestion. I'm already formulating it.

To Thesis or Not To Thesis

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:11:00 +0000

Well, the time has come to start seriously considering (or not) a thesis. With the program I'm in, I have only one class after this one, then I have to decide if I'm going to do a thesis. The reason being is that I have to do my research seminar and my comps before a thesis. If I don't do a thesis I will still have two more courses before the seminar and comps.

Ok, I have a little time, but I need to make up my mind and quit wasting time on it. There are many pros to doing a thesis. It shortens my time in gradschool by a year, saves me money and might even mean being published. However, with the nature of my job, it could mean a great deal MORE stress.

Honestly, I think the hesitation is my own lack of confidence in my abilities. I don't have a topic and I don't even know if I can write well enough--I do great research but the writing is the hard part.

Guess I'll be pondering this for a while.

Cheers

Suggestion in!

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:24:00 +0000

Well, after much mulling and solicitation of comments from friends and colleagues, the suggestion for the mentor program is submitted to the president of the association. It's time to see what's going to happen. Patience, they tell me, is a virtue.

I hope I have that much virtue.

World War II Memorial Glorifies War

noreply@blogger.com (Netter the Historian) — Sun, 16 Sep 2007 15:20:00 +0000

Yes, someone actually said that to me---not only to me but a whole room of other people. I've been to the memorial several times. Both grandfathers and a dear man who was like a grandfather served in WWII. I don't think I can honestly agree with the person's comments that it glorifies war.

Actually, I was enraged by the person's comment that it glorifies war. For those of you who've not yet had the chance to see the memorial, please do visit it one day. These men and women who served are dying at a rate of 1,200-1,500 a DAY and they were the last to be memorialized in our Nation's capital.

At the center of the memorial, seated at the head of a table as the honored guest, are those who died--represented by stars. It's very moving to be standing there in front of all the stars and realize they represent very human and real people who gave their life for their country. The ultimate sacrifice.

Then, as honored guests at the table, are the states with wreaths again memorializing the dead. How does this glorify war? It doesn't romanticize it either. This memorial makes us remember what sacrifice looks like in large scale. It reminds the nation that when called, millions answered and many knew they were not going to return. They didn't do it for glory. They didn't do it for fame. They did it because they were asked and were grateful for their freedom--so grateful they felt they needed to pay for it with their own life and would do so if need be.

Glorify war? The person who spoke those words needs to stand in front of the stars a little longer and then speak to those veterans who lost their friends, brothers, uncles, fathers, because she obviously hasn't grasped it. She hasn't heard the pain in their voices, not joy. She hasn't heard the humbleness in their voice nor has she seen their tears when remembering their comrades in arms.

Glorify war? Keep dreamin' lady.